Naveen Mysore publishes AI safety novel for general readers

Research engineer Naveen Mysore has released Fog on a Mountain, Run Run Run: A Story of AI, a novel set in the San Francisco Bay Area that examines AI safety, trust and human responsibility. The book and related essays aim to make questions about how AI is built, checked and governed accessible to readers without a technical background.

Why it matters: - The book brings AI safety, transparency and responsibility into a story format that general readers can understand. - The novel focuses on the human consequences of machine decisions, not just the technology itself. - The work adds a public-facing voice to debates over who benefits from AI, who bears its risks and who gets a say in how it is used.

What happened: - Research engineer and author Naveen Mysore released Fog on a Mountain, Run Run Run: A Story of AI. - The novel is set in the San Francisco Bay Area. - Mysore says the book examines AI safety through its human consequences. - Mysore is based in San Francisco.

The details: - The book asks what happens when people rely on machines whose decisions they cannot understand. - The story draws on scientific ideas and concerns to explore trust, responsibility and choices around technology. - Mysore says science fiction can help people imagine what science may make possible and think carefully about consequences. - Mysore has more than 10 years of experience in software engineering and research. - Mysore says his interest in AI safety grew alongside his study of scientific and engineering history. - He argues that scientific discoveries often bring both benefits and unforeseen consequences. - In his essay What If Everyone Owned AI?, Mysore uses the history of public infrastructure, including aqueducts and electricity, to ask who AI should serve. - The essay explores a future in which communities have more influence over AI while businesses build products on a shared foundation. - The essay raises questions about who benefits from AI, who pays its costs and who decides how quickly it changes daily life. - The essay frames this as a direction to explore, not a finished answer, because technical research alone cannot settle questions about ownership, privacy and public participation. - Mysore’s broader work links technical questions with everyday concerns about trust, questioning machine answers and assigning responsibility when something goes wrong.

Between the lines: - Mysore is positioning AI safety as a civic issue, not only a technical one. - The use of fiction suggests an attempt to reach readers who may not follow AI research closely but still live with its effects. - The infrastructure comparison points to a broader argument that AI may require shared rules and public input, similar to other essential systems.

What's next: - Mysore says he is available for US podcast, radio, television, print and online interviews, along with guest-article opportunities. - He plans to continue using research, essays and fiction to encourage curiosity about AI’s possibilities and caution about its risks. - Readers can find more information on Mysore’s website, the book, the essay and his Medium profile.